Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Soft deletion/Proposed deletion

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:57, 4 February 2014 (UTC) (NAC)

Soft deletion/Proposed deletion


Unused content from 2007, related to failed proposal Soft deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 16:30, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Part of a failed proposal.  We don't delete failed proposals.  Merging to the content of the failed proposal might be a good idea, if the existence of a page under this title is considered a problem.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:54, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep but tag as historical. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:01, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm concerned that this page is misleading, both in that it implies that this page, itself, was soft deleted and that it implies that this is a process we currently use. Tagging as historical would solve the second problem but not the first. I wouldn't mind replacing this page with a brief explanation of the process, marked as historical, but I don't want to see it kept as is. If it's just a historical tag and this tag itself, that's going to look really confusing. --BDD (talk) 17:18, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep With this edit, my concerns have been addressed. --BDD (talk) 19:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Part of a failed proposal, and therefore it shouldn't be deleted. Armbrust The Homunculus 18:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.