Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Spotlight (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 09:12, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Spotlight


Dead project, this page has been almost inactive like WP:ACID which previously nominated for deletion which was tagged as inactive. JJ98 (Talk)  02:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as ephemeral, though redirection would also be OK if someone can suggest a good target. -- Klein zach  03:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Why don't you just mark it as historical/inactive? I'm not really sure if you're seeking for deletion based on your nomination statement. Killiondude (talk) 04:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Tag as inactive once again. No need to delete the extensive history. Graham 87 06:00, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Mark historical, deleting all the history does not seem to serve any useful purpose. —Кузьма討論 12:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep and tag historical. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WikiProject Japan ! 16:30, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep and leave tagged as inactive. There were several incarnations of this IIRC. Collaborative editing is what wikipedia is supposed to be about, and this approach directly undermines that. Tagging as inactive saves some future collaborators reinventing the wheel. Casliber (talk · contribs) 15:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.