Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Strong

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy keep. No valid reason for deletion (non-admin closure) funplussmart (talk) 17:46, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Strong

 * – (View MfD)

The content of the essay is good, but it seems redundant with the section at WP:JUSTAVOTE, a part of the major essay Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. I don't see a reason to have two essays that state essentially the same thing. See reasoning at Avoid writing redundant essays. Paul McDonald (talk) 18:45, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep No policy-based reason for deletion is presented. This essay is short and to the point and does not only apply to deletion discussions anyway. This nomination reeks of sour grapes over the discussion of WP:WEAK. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:40, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's an essay. The rule to avoid writing redundant essays is an essay.  So what?  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:25, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, nomination offers no policy-based reason for deletion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:53, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.