Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Historicalize. In other words, tag with and carry on. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations


This page is dependent on User:CorenSearchBot which has been inactive for over a year. All other cases are being processed at WP:Copyright problems. Pinging to see if User:EranBot is supposed to be a substitute for the bot, or if they know about plans to restart this one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:30, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * EranBot is active and provides somewhat similar capabilities. The bot doesn't log suspected edits into Wikipedia page (it did it in the past User:EranBot/Copyright/rc) but instead logs it to database and users can monitor edits using CopyPatrol. AFAIK, CorenSearchBot works only on new pages, while EranBot works on any diff, and CorenSearchBot was based on Yahoo! Search while EranBot is based on Turnitin. Eran (talk) 18:00, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Mark as Historical. EranBot/CopyPatrol/Turnitin seem to be good alternatives for CorenBot, which never really survived YahooBOSS closing down. That said, SCV contains hundreds of subpages, one for every day reported by the CorenBot. There may or may not be useful historical data in there, so I'd rather (for now) just tag this with Template:Historical and remove it from the various templates, resources, menus, etc. Crow  Caw  19:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Sounds like a reason to tag, or blank&Tag as historical. I don’t read any rationale to delete. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I opened this to figure out what to do with the page, which includes marking it as historical not just deletion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Archive. Eg, replace content with a historical tag. No prejudice against reactivation if the bot is reactivated. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:53, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.