Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:TIVR

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete - G11 either way, move it to the main space, where it would belong, and it'd be an A7. Wily D 09:54, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

TIVR


Article created in 2009 published in non-article space, presumably by mistake. I don't see much point in moving it to article or user space as the subject (from a quick google) doesn't seem to be notable and the short paragraph of content is purely promotional. But if I have missed something and others disagree then I'm happy for it to shunted to wherever. wintonian  talk  02:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Creator has made only one other edit than this, which was a test. Looks like an attempt to circumvent mainspace deletion processes; this would have qualified for CSD A7 otherwise. MER-C 06:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * It is my understanding that pages in non articles space should come here for deletion discussion. If however a mis·filed articles was worth keeping the it could be merged/ moved into article space, which as you seem to agree doesn't apply here. Yes It would likely qualify for A7, however would It not need to be moved ito article space first? Finally there used to be a presumption of good faith here. -- wintonian  talk  11:59, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * In hindsight, this is highly likely to be a drive-by promotion attempt. MER-C 06:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.