Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: WP:FOOLS. — xaosflux  Talk 00:23, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:TenPoundHammer's Law


Blatant self-promotion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Eat this too per nom nom nom. '''[[User:ProDuct0339|Diamond Miner7]]'''OnWHEELz!april fools!ProDuct0339 01:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Rename, but keep. Given this thing is now 8 human years old, in wiki-years it's developed a middle aged spread by now, so I'm sure it's heavier than ten pounds by now. Also keep because I like hammers. Well, not banhammers, but you get the idea :) --Hammersoft (talk) 02:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete because I'm jealous that I don't get a law! CamelCase (Talk &#124; Contribs) 02:45, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Pfft! Whiner! You have your own wikipedia page! You must be a hat collector. ;) --Hammersoft (talk) 03:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge with Uranus because why not? -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 15:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.