Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:The best way to avoid ever being blocked (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 22:29, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

The best way to avoid ever being blocked


Now that the user who created this thinly-veiled complaint about her long and well-deserved block log has been site-banned, I assume we can delete this and prevent it from accidentally being treated as legitimate content (eg. 1) –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 05:58, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. While the line of what is considered "involved" is often a blurry one, this essay is tagged as "humor".  I don't see a need to delete it, and in fact can find a pearl of wisdom in the concept that editors have indeed tried to use the concept to appeal a block.  Further, I do not find the "who created it" as a substantial cause for deletion. — Ched :  ?  06:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. There is some truth in it.  It is a valid opinion related to the project.  On the other hand, it's importance should not be overstated, and it may not deserve its own page.  Is there a Project page of controversial and disgruntled opinions to which it could be merged?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:50, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, but use the Joke Alert template. The fact  that  it was created by  a user who  has since been banned is not  a reason  to  delete it. It  really  is in  fact  quite funny -  why  didn't I think  of it  myself? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep and use the Joke Alert template. This is actually very clever. T  C  N7 JM  06:03, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes, it was created by a disruptive editor, no doubt intending it to refer to their own experience, but so what? It's humorous, and does no harm. As for the risk of its being "accidentally being treated as legitimate content" ... seriously? JamesBWatson (talk) 09:58, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, and add the humor template - I laughed! --Yellow1996 (talk) 17:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually the humor template was there before the AfD template. — Ched : ?  20:07, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I meant the much more conspicuous . --Yellow1996 (talk) 20:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.