Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:The online encyclopedia where the guidelines overpowers the common sense

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted per WP:G3. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:The online encyclopedia where the guidelines overpowers the common sense

 * – (View MfD)

POV screed against supposed 'brainwashing' on Wikipedia that I struggled to make head or tail of. Entirely useless. Creator admits on the page to having two alternate accounts ( and ) for what it's worth as well. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 09:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Userfy: Unreadable screed about the writer's hot-button temper issues? Sounds like the average userspace essay. More seriously, this certainly shouldn't be in projectspace, but I'm not seeing the degree to which having a "this is one guy's bizarre ideas" on top of the "don't take this seriously" tag already existing is insufficient. The general shape of "guideline wonks try to steamroll over common sense" is...not an uncommon position, I have to say, even if the presentation here is unendorsable to most of the people who'd agree with the baseline. That said, I would redact the names of the other users involved to avoid the potential of attack-page issues (I don't think it rises to being one, but it's not a good look). Vaticidalprophet (talk) 12:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Adjusting to delete per further thought. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 11:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Userfy per Vaticidalprophet, doesn't need to be deleted but still doesn't belong in projectspace. —  csc -1 14:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, I just re-read it, and uh... yeah that needs to go. —  csc -1 18:33, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, and delete it with fire, at that. Or blank and revdel. This kind of language: "I have enough of shoving countless hours of my life into your insatiable throat. Yes, you are a ravenous, eternally discontent leech of human vigor, and as for every other gutter whore taking pleasure in having a ride with all the mange-ridden dogs in the street, there is a point where you will be tossed into a roadside ditch and left fending for yourself." belongs nowhere on Wikipedia, and not even on BJAODN. Not only is this a poorly written temper-tantrum that does not say anything that other rants do not already say, it also doesn't merit its 'don't take it seriously' tag - the author very much does want us to take this sob story seriously, as evidenced by the caustic language, and is (ab)using the Humorous Material tag as a free pass to use said language. A counter-argument to my stance could be "But Wilhelm, why don't we just remove the caustic language?" Well, it isn't our job to clean up someone else's mess. And a mess this certainly is. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 17:03, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I read this entire thing and uh - while it's somewhat funny - it doesn't really belong here. Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 04:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Vandalism and a pure attack page. This is not humour, this is unacceptable totally.  Java Hurricane  05:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, the creator needs to blocked for evasion: Rampage killer has been blocked for three years, and this page thus is created in violation of that block.  Java Hurricane  05:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - Imagine being this mad at being blocked that you have to create such drivel as this .... rather sad really. If you're indeffed there's probably a very good reason for that. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete with silver bullets. Are they mad at being blocked, or just raving mad?  It doesn't matter.  Robert McClenon (talk) 21:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Tagged for speedy deletion per G3, G5, G10 Since that's where this is going (and creator reported at SPI) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.