Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:There's no point

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  userfy to User:Resoru/There's no point. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:23, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:There's no point


Three-sentence mini rant. Not humorous BilCat (talk) 01:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Userfy to User:Resoru/There's no point. Can be read as a user's opinion, on one day, but as written it is wrong.  Delete the projectspace shortcuts.  Not humor.  Not a valid multi-authored or supported essay.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Userfy There is no point in keeping this :) LOL. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 02:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, serves no purpose for the encyclopedia. Why userfy if "there is no point in keeping this"? -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Because deletion of criticism can lead to plausible claims of censorship. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Userfy - It's not appropriate in WP space but okay as a user space essay. -- Whpq (talk) 17:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.