Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Things to be moved to Wiktionary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep, mark as historical. Xoloz 03:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Things to be moved to Wiktionary
Page has been rendered redundant for quite some time now, by Category:Copy to Wiktionary. TheProject 22:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. There's a big notice at the top with instructions for the new procedure.  Do we need a new Template_messages/Project_namespace for former policy?  Failing that, we could protect it, if we decide we're really concerned.  Probably just leave it alone, though.  --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 23:30, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The template you're looking for is historical. Perhaps that applies here, though I'm not completely convinced.  Regardless, a deletion is inappropriate because we routinely keep both obsoleted and failed policies so that we can learn from them in the future.  Rossami (talk) 01:33, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for historical interest. -- Tantalum Telluride 03:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Yanksox 20:46, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.