Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Today's featured list


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep. This is not the way to deal with proposals you don't like, especially active ones. Mr.  Z- man  18:54, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Today's featured list
This "proposal" purports to be running an experiment on another proposal for Main Paging featured lists. Basically, this is the third proposal in the last month or so for such a process. Not only is the page massively redundant but it presumes to enforce the results of what it bills "an experiment" onto the Main Page despite acknowledging that Featured Lists don't have consensus to appear on the Main Page. This page has absolutely no use, at the very least it shouldn't be in the Wikipedia namespace. The first rejected proposal is here, a voting system that was roundly rejected. The second proposal was just for lists to appear on the Main Page, seen here. The page I am nominating for deletion acknowledges that the second proposal is unlikely to gain consensus at this point. What's the point of this page? Delete. IvoShandor 18:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep There is no reason to halt a proposal. It should just be allowed to run.  Both prior proposals had significant majorities.  This is a chance to work around the overwhelming majority needed to actually change the main page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 18:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Of course you did create this redundant mess. IvoShandor 18:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * So you readily admit this is an attempt to avoid consensus, if that isn't a reason for it to be deleted I don't know what is. IvoShandor 18:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * SPEEDY KEEP per WP:MFD above. This is disruptive.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 18:21, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * No jackass, creating redundant pages and accusing good faith users of being disruptive is disruptive.IvoShandor 18:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Just because the proposal is bad doesn't mean the page should be deleted. It need to be talked about and disscused. I am sure main people want Lists on the Main Page, but a proposal needs to worked out, which can't happen if the page is deleted. The Placebo Effect 18:13, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * There is already a FL on the Main Page proposal. No one can explain why we need this, because we don't, discuss it on the proposal already being proposed. Two proposals on the same topic? What for? IvoShandor 18:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. If the proposal is bad, it will fail.  Last I checked, there was no limit as to how often a proposal can be re-submitted.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - this is a proposed policy, and so far it appears to have quite a positive response from the community. One person not liking it is not a reason for deletion. If ultimately this gets rejected by the community, then it can be tagged as historical, but there should be documentation kept to show what was proposed. At present, we aren't ready to make a decision whether or not this is accepted or rejected.  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  18:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep OK, it's been discussed before, and recently. I would like to see it fully discussed and a community consensus position reached. Once this is done, the discussion can then be cited as a precedent should the issue arise again in the near future. But I wouldn't want to see debate stifled. -- Rodhullandemu  (talk - contribs) 18:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.