Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Top 5000 pages

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  No Action This is a redirect, take it to WP:RFD. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 11:25, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Top 5000 pages


There does not appear to be a guideline on Wikipedia to User namespace redirects but I think it is a bad thing to have. Not as bad as article namespace to User namespace of course. The same applies to WP:5000. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * This is being done so I can automatically update the page without the bot flag on my account (automated edits to user-space can be done w/o restriction). West.andrew.g (talk) 23:12, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

I think this page is quite interesting and useful- it would be a shame if it is not easily accessible from contents. 121.45.213.102 (talk) 01:16, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: If there is any fixing that needs to be done for policy reasons, do it.  But I think the underlying report itself is quite important.--Milowent • hasspoken  06:20, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.