Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Trilliоn pool


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete per MfD precedent on the billion pool. I'm going to interpret all rules here. Precedent must be allowed to govern in these number cases, or we could end up with an infinite number of MfDs, one for every value of "Large Number X" Pool. Hence speedy close to this and any future absurdly-large pool I see. Xoloz 14:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Trilliоn pool
Utterly pointless. We're never going to have even a billion articles, let alone a trillion. Delete. – Gurch 07:29, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, just pointless, wait for 100 years before we have such a pool. --Ter e nce Ong (T 07:55, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per my comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Quadrilliоn pool. Georgia guy 18:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. While I don't see any evidence of actual misconduct, this is a pointless page.  Note:  If/when this is deleted, please also clean up the redirects Million-million pool and Million million pool.  Rossami (talk) 03:39, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete For the same reasons as the Quadrillion pool. Well Drawn   Charli  e  09:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.