Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Trillionth edit pool

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  14:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Trillionth edit pool

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;











Nominating another batch of useless WP:Pools. I found a lot more to delete after the first MfD had been up for a while; the same arguments apply for why these should be deleted. — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 19:36, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * My standard for nominating pages is more or less: if we're less than halfway to the target number AND there's little or no participation in the pool, I nominated it. — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 19:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * And done. Not all the FL and GA pools meet the criteria above, but I feel like those numbers (EDIT: statistics) aren't important enough to have pools about. — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 20:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete all per nom. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her) My Talk Page  22:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 01:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete all Only a small number of Wikipedians are able to make humor work and these pages are pointless. Johnuniq (talk) 02:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete all, mostly as stupid stuff, and for other reasons also. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:13, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.