Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Truthfully the Best of BJAODN

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Speedily Deleted per G5 Achowat (talk) 15:32, 9 May 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Truthfully the Best of BJAODN


Attempt to recreate WP:BJAODN, in other words: a silly collection of boring, unfunny vandalism. I'm half tempted to speedy it under G4, but I guess some people might argue it doesn't meet the letter of the rule. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:38, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete (I would say it might meet G6, but like G4, that'd be a huge stretch) - This page was created with a historical on it. Absolutely no value in keeping it. Achowat (talk) 12:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete.&mdash;Kww(talk) 13:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Bearing in mind also that the author is a sockblocked lulz-only account, I think it's fair to get rid. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 15:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * That makes it easier: I've deleted under G5.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:28, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * no--31.200.151.140 (talk) 15:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.