Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:UfD

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete * Pppery * it has begun... 18:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:UfD

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

The first item has had its target changed to the second item, so this is now virtually a two-item disambiguation (the third item is a proposal to split userboxes from MFD which was the previous target). I think this should be redirected to the Users for deletion joke page. Xeroctic (talk) 19:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. April fools jokes should not lead to preserved redirects or WP DAB pages.
 * Original this was for Userboxes for discussion, a serious proposal that failed in 2006. SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment - This page was viewed 40 times in calendar year 2023, which is less than one view per week. It has been viewed 56 times in calendar year 2024, but 17 of those views were on 6 May 2024 because of this nomination.  There is very little attention paid to this page.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Redirect to ANI without a hatnote per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Userboxes for deletion only has gotten 31 views in the last 2 years and has no relevance today. Ca talk to me!  01:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment The redirect to ANI was retargeted last month, which now redirects to the recurring April Fools' joke page; the discussion mentioned that the Users for deletion redirect going there may not have fitted well. Xeroctic (talk) 14:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and SmokeyJoe. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 22:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per SmokeyJoe. The April Fools' entry should not have a shortcut, and should not be a project space dab entry, leaving the redirect to the failed proposal as the shortcut target, but this failed proposal does not need a shortcut and should not have one either, so the page should be deleted. If not deleting, I support redirecting to the failed proposal, which means restoring the original redirect, the way it was at the time of creation, as the second choice.—Alalch E. 22:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.