Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Users Advice Bureau


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  19:58, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Users Advice Bureau
Old project that never got off the ground, mostly the in-progress work of a single retired user. Duplicates WP:Help desk and incorporates some of the less desirable parts of the former WP:AMA.  MBisanz  talk 19:17, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I doubt that neither of the maintainers will ever return to Wikipedia because of incident well-known. Sceptre (talk) 19:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Exactly what incident is this? Hers fold  (t/a/c) 22:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't claim well-known, but I would claim exceedingly ugly.  bibliomaniac 1  5  20:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Restrictive membership, inactive, and duplicates other areas that function perfectly well. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 22:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the reasons given above: no need to keep the pages of this old, never-active proposed project. Terraxos (talk) 00:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Inactive and redundant. Glass  Cobra  02:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The {this is undergoing a major expansion" tag was added over two years ago.  Keeper    76  15:09, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Inactive and creators are retired.--RadianSeize (talk) 00:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep mark as historical or userfy. It's not problematic, so there's no reason to delete it. It's an interesting idea, even if it won't work in it's current form. It's not like deleting it is going to save hard drive space. -- Ned Scott 06:49, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the reasons given above. While deletion does not save hard drive space, it does save editors from running into (and spending time trying to figure out) the page at some time in the future. –Black Falcon (Talk) 17:47, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.