Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress/JarlaxleArtemis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete Tito xd (?!? - help us) 06:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism in progress/JarlaxleArtemis
This is a vandal description page for User:JarlaxleArtemis, who has since been redeemed. There is no longer any need to track his edits or sockpuppets, nor is there any reason to keep it as a black mark against a valuable editor. The page should be deleted in the same spirit as the precedent Long term abuse/MARMOT. Pathoschild 02:47, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with a hug for our redeemed wiki-colleagues! :) Xoloz 07:32, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Idont Havaname 02:34, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. BD2412  T 03:09, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, which, uh, I already did once.--Sean|Bla ck 03:17, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Terence Ong Talk 09:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete although it might be worth retaining the story as an example to vandals who might need help to reform. David | Talk 20:48, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Don't see the problem. The page says he's an editor in good standing now. If anything, this page is a record of his redemption. --Ryan Delaney talk 06:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, pointless since the vandalism is no longer "in progress" and there's no reason to believe that it will be again in the future. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 07:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.