Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress/List of pages with "on wheels" added to/punned with "on wheels" or Willy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete Hiding  talk 00:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism in progress/List of pages with "on wheels" added to/punned with "on wheels" or Willy
Do we really need this? If this survives, I wanna create List of vandals, List of pages that have been vandalized, List of vandal's' vandalisms and List of users who shot the sheriff. Putting this up @ the request of Pathoschild from IRC! 68.39.174.238 07:53, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom; it strikes me as unnecessary, providing no information useful to vandal-fighting, and far too incomplete to be useful if we disregard that. // Pathoschild 07:59, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanity ON WHEELS!!!!!! CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 09:33, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I suppose its attempted humor, but humor really doesn't belong at VIP, and it doesn't make sense to BJAODN. Xoloz 16:30, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this is not realted to the VIP project, or it's tracking. xaosflux  Talk  / CVU  17:25, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The only thing this seems good for is informing us that WoW CAN do things other then append "on Wheels!" to things. 68.39.174.238 18:00, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete unnecessary junk --Jaranda wat's sup 19:08, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete on wheels --Doc ask? 01:53, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and de-wheel. Vandalism_in_progress/List_of_pages_with_"on_wheels"_added_to doesn't exist anyway, so why have a subpage of a subpage? --Idont Havaname 02:37, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not a "sub page", its an alternate (Sortof like "and/or"). 68.39.174.238 06:17, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * That's a point well-noted, but it's still not necessarily a good naming convention; see Naming conventions (technical restrictions): "Slashes elsewhere in page titles can have some largely harmless side-effects as they are treated as Subpages, for example producing the spurious "< Talk:R" appearing in Talk:R/2004 S 1." So the slash should be replaced with " or " - that is, if the page is kept after this AfD discussion.  I'm still standing by my delete vote at the moment.  Due to the huge number of WoW sockpuppets, the list would be unmaintainable, and it would be better for us to just block the WoW accounts and move on to dealing with other vandals, rather than trying to go back and archive all of his page moves. --Idont Havaname 06:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not suggesting it's a good name or that it should stay, I'm (Or was since that was yesterday?!) explaning why it was a(n accedental) subpage. 68.39.174.238 16:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.