Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Librarians articles by quality




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep both. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Librarians articles by quality and Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Librarians articles by quality log
Relisted on 03:49, 30 March 2010 (UTC).

Wikiproject was merged to WikiProject Libraries. No reason to keep this around if the Wikiproject's essentially gone. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 14:13, 18 March 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 03:49, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep the first  The first page was never actually moved to the new project name. I have moved it now. The second is a duplicate.    DGG ( talk ) 15:47, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep both -- from reviewing them, the pages don't contain the precise same information. It may be just historical, but that's no reason to delete. Let's just mark the second as deprecated. --SJK (talk) 08:45, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and tag appropriately. As per SJK, and as no good reason is given for deletion.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.