Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Pinehouse Photography Club articles by quality statistics

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:46, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/X articles by quality statistics

 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)
 * – (View MfD)

Bot seems to have given up on this page after trying to edit it for a few weeks in August-October. Le Deluge (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Per WP:G6. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 16:51, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I have merged all the separate nominations into a single discussion for obvious reasons. However, I just went ahead and removed Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/http:// articles by quality statistics since I already nominated it for speedy deletion per WP:G6. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 17:19, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Per WP:G6 and above. No need to prolong this one. Britishfinance (talk) 22:21, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.