Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Waste of Time (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  April 1 is over Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:44, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Waste of Time
It's a waste of time. Says so right there in the title. :-P —Signature in preceding messsage removed by DoNotSignBot.
 * Agree. However, participation here is not enough to call a quorum for such a decision.  Please advertise more widely as per Publicising discussions.  An RFC should be held, lasting no less than thirty days, where the first fifteen include a watchlist notice for all users.  Transclude the discussion onto all XfD pages and all noticeboards, and Jimbo's talk page, as the result, whether one way or another, has implications to them all.  —Signature in preceding messsage removed by DoNotSignBot.
 * This is Jimbo's policy, so only he can decide not to go ahead with implementation of the policy. As I understand it, the implementation has been delayed by the carbon credit hacking incident. —Signature in preceding messsage removed by DoNotSignBot.
 * Procrastinate —Signature in preceding messsage removed by DoNotSignBot.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.