Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiAfrica/Stubs/Colonial Malawi

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 18:48, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiAfrica/Stubs/Colonial Malawi

 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 15:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 15:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Single sentence draft from December 2014 that seems to be already be covered by British Central Africa Protectorate. I'm not sure what else can be done other than perhaps moving the page to mainspace to redirect to British Central Africa Protectorate. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Waste of time nomination, considering that it is completely harmless and could be blanked or redirected to the article noted. Has a conversation been opened at the WikiProject talk page about your cleaning out of their subpages?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:20, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * It's not a WikiProject. It has been inactive since 2014 and yes there was a notice about the mass deletion of the truly purely empty pages at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiAfrica/Stubs/Abel Tilahun. Following the deletion of the drafts that there were pure copyright violations, and movement for plausible drafts pursuant to a discussion about WT:AFC, there remains various pages that are already covered in mainspace. I've taken these to MFD precisely because these are not my pages and so discussion is warranted and preferable in my opinion than randomly blanking drafts based on a single editor's opinion. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:37, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to British Central Africa Protectorate. That is my considered opinion, and not all "random".  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is nothing here worth keeping, nor anything to merge. No need to keep it around indefinitely. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.