Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiAtheism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  userfied by creator. — Animum  (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

WikiAtheism
Unneeded wiki-meta creatures/games/whatever occupying Wikipedia namespace. See the related discussion Miscellany_for_deletion, which covers some of this too. :| TelCo NaSp  Ve :|  01:13, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Klein zach  01:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete it is useless.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  06:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete or userfy. Not a helpful contribution.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yeah, agreed with above comments. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 08:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Userfy. Do not delete. Original writer is an active editor and is entitled to not have his good faith work destroyed. Not sufficiently developed to be in mainspace at this time, though, so userfy it. If he can work it up some he can put it back in mainspace. Herostratus (talk) 08:29, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Userfy per Herostratus. If moved to userspace, this essay would comply with WP:UPYES, as it's an essay on an editing philosophy, so, in my opinion, there is no need to delete. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 14:25, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Userfy, if the user wants it. It's basically a personal statement and if they want to keep it they can keep it in their own space. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 19:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.