Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiBIBL




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. @harej 01:47, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiBIBL
Abandoned attempt at a WikiProject. If the project had been active, I would recommend marking as historical, but it appears that it never had any members other than the editor who created it, and was never used for any project activities. Additionally, the basic concept of the project ("apologist activity") appears to go against WP:NPOV. RL0919 (talk) 04:20, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Abandoned July 2007, Single member (the creator). related WikiBIBLMenu. --Hu12 (talk) 06:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with RL0919 in full. This attempted WikiProject never got off the ground, had only one member (who has been inactive for ages), and is unused. Keeping this around can only give people bad ideas about editing tendentiously. Send the template to TfD if the consensus here is to delete. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 17:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Since the only use of that template is on this page and it has no function without the project, I believe it can be deleted along with the page as a WP:CSD. But happy to do a TFD if that reasoning is controversial. --RL0919 (talk) 18:05, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I think a seperate Tfd would be futile and waste time, as it is clearly speedy per WP:CSD#G8 and non-controversial, if the project itself is deleted.--Hu12 (talk) 18:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think that would be a valid application of G8. I've struck the part of my vote recommending a TfD. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 19:35, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Based on the description of what WikiBIBL is, I can confidently conclude that it is not a WikiProject. WikiProjects are projects "devoted to the management of a specific topic or family of topics within Wikipedia"; they are not projects devoted to the advancement of a particular point of view or of The Undiluted, Unquestionable, Unshakeable, and Unchanging TruthTM. –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 00:05, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a wikiproject. Nyttend (talk) 22:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete the paramount example of what a Wikiproject is not- a bloc of editors to push a certain viewpoint on the encyclopedia. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 16:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.