Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiBogeyman

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. North America1000 12:51, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

WikiBogeyman


One of the proliferation of wikifauna over the past two years. This fauna does nothing to increase collaboration on this project. Guerillero &#124;  Parlez Moi  04:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep-Nominator gives no reason this particular nomination should be deleted, he merely provided the generic reason he has provided for the multiple Wikifauna MfD nominations he has posted in a very short time. It seems like the decision to nominate is being made based on an opinion of Wikifauna as a whole, not based on objective review of individual essays. That's not how deletion nominations should work, and it starts to approach violating WP:POINT. I don't see how most or even any wikifauna "increase collaberation on the project." Can anyone give me any examples of wikifauna that do increase collaboration on the project in a concrete way, and examples of how they do that? This essay doesn't violate any policies, it doesn't contradict or subvert policy, and it is related to Wikipedia, at least as related as many other Wikifauna. Like all Wikifauna, it's an essay, and essays are generally kept, even if they are just humorous essays, unless they violate, subvert, or contradict policy, or don't have anything to do with Wikipedia. Mmyers1976 (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.