Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiKing

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep, no consensus. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

WikiKing


Part of the proliferation of wikifauna. It encourages ownership contrary to policy and does nothing to increase collaboration. Guerillero &#124;  Parlez Moi  04:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


 * User:Guerillero, would you mind commenting at Wikipedia_talk:WikiFauna on what makes a Wikifauna acceptable/unacceptable? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Very Weak Delete- I can sort of see the nominator's point that this essay contradicts the policy against page ownership, even if its encouragement of page ownership is somewhat mediated by also talking about the potential problems of WikiKings. Mmyers1976 (talk) 15:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep I thought the jihad against page ownership had reached its zenith of absurdity with the effort to delete WP:OWN as encouraging ownership. Hawkeye7 (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.