Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject 24

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep as a formerly active project with some possibility of reactivation. No prejudice against converting into a task force if there is a larger project that wants it. --RL0919 (talk) 05:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject 24
Dead project, only 27 members. This project was started back in 2006 and went inactive in 2010 with no activity since. JJ98 (Talk)  19:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of history that should be kept even if only as an archive.  Scope is a little narrow, but could be revived or assimilated into larger project.  There is no need for deletion here, and deletion would hinder possible future progress.  Mere inactivity is not a good reason to delete.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * keep this will make a mess if you delete a project involved in so many articles. History sections will be referring to categories and project page that no longer exist if you deleted them.   I would suggest that only still born projects are deleted, rather than ones that did a reasonable about of work and then stalled. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Taskforce of WikiProject Television — assuming they want it. -- Klein zach  01:18, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep and mark as historical. Many TV series have WikiProjects, and this one seems significant enough to justify one. There seems to be some discussion that could be useful in the future. And I can think of many active projects that would love to have 27 members... Alzarian16 (talk) 09:38, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Taskforce per kleinzach. --  E♴  (talk)  14:47, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep either tag as inactive or make it into a task force. There is a LOT of discussion and work that went on there. We do not delete WikiProjects simply because they are inactive. -- Ned Scott 09:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep It is historical and it is a big project that while dead for now, will sometime be restarted if we could get someone to lead the project.--Lan Di (talk) 00:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.