Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Journals cited by Wikipedia/Questionable6

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  00:18, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Academic Journals/Journals cited by Wikipedia/Questionable6

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This should be speedy deleted as a useless page, but stubborn admins refuse to delete it. It's useless. Delete it. It hasn't been used in over 8+ months and won't ever be again, unless some massive expansion of the citewatch happens. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:37, 8 July 2023 (UTC)


 * This is a bot management issue. Where is the discussion with the bot owner? SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * User:JLaTondre Is an active editor, and his talk page is very quiet. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:50, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * There's no issue, the bot works flawlessly. I suppose JLaTondre could delete the page himself, but this is getting pretty damned ridiculous to have to jump through so many hoops to delete a useless page that will never be used again. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If it was used, but won’t be used again, that is a reason to archive, not to delete. SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * There's nothing worth archiving, and it just takes space in JCW-Main for no reason. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Archive by blanking. It then won’t show up in that template. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:57, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * It was blanked and it showed up. This needs deleting. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:37, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is no value in this page. The page was autogenerated for Wikipedia maintenance purposes. The WP:CITEWATCH processing looks for unreliable publications cited by Wikipedia. The configuration has been updated over time and now results in only 5 pages. This page was purely for maintenance purposes, has no historical value, and is unwanted by the Wikiproject. -- JLaTondre (talk) 12:53, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per User:JLaTondre. SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:58, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, as obviously useless for the project. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 15:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Question for User:Headbomb and User:JLaTondre - Is this being created by a bot? Will deletion get rid of it, or will the bot recreate it? `Robert McClenon (talk) 15:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * It's bot created and managed. If there's a need for re-creation, the bot will re-create it. But that's very unlikely at this point, as the listing is stably well below 500 entries. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.