Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Accuracy

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Userfy. It may be prudential to not move it back without local or broad consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:14, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Accuracy


Completely untouched since foundation last year. Only discussion on talk page is how the project is completely out of line. This project is not linked from any articles, and its aims seem to counter many of our guidelines. Indeed, WikiProject Accuracy/Participants lists only one participant. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:45, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * As project creator I'd like for it to be Userfied, please? I would do it but now that it's here, it's just as well if  does it. Thanks. Atsme 📞📧 14:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Support WP:Userfication as requested. bd2412  T 16:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Userfy as requested (or, failing that, mark as "historical"). --Tryptofish (talk) 20:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Userfy, without prejudice to moving back should multiple editors begin to participate. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * , the project was actually under consideration of funding by WMF and while there were a few issues that needed to be addressed for it to proceed, I chose to withdraw it instead. Further, the MfD guidelines actually state: "Established pages and their sub-pages should not be nominated, as such nominations will probably be considered disruptive, and the ensuing discussions closed early. This is not a forum for modifying or revoking policy. Instead consider tagging the policy as or redirecting it somewhere." I've asked for it to be userfied, so it is actually a SPEEDY KEEP - Userfy for when I have time to tweak and recruit members. Atsme 📞📧 14:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * You removed the funding request and afaict you never submitted the project application, so saying it was actually under consideration of funding by WMF is not precisely true. Ca2james (talk) 00:20, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I wasn't aware that you were sitting in on my phone and Skype conversations with one of the WMF Community Organizers. Oh wait - you must not have been or you'd actually know what took place. Believe it or not, there are some things one can discuss with staff that are not shared publicly until all the details have been worked out, such as whether or not the funding is likely and what other material must be presented in order to move forward. Atsme 📞📧 03:47, 12 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Userfy provided it isn't moved back into project space until community consensus (both implicit, through participants, and explicit, through some kind of public RFC  or similar) supports the project. Ca2james (talk) 00:20, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.