Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Assessment/Archive1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. Greeves (talk • contribs) 13:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Albums/Assessment/Archive1
This log of assessments is not comprehensive - most people have simply assessed the article and removed it from the list. Assessment results are shown in the template on the article talk page instead. Other assessment pages, such as WP:GAC do not use an archive of results either. Requiring an editor to update this log is unreliable, and adds an unnecessary task to the assessment process. Papa November 1 10:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Tag historical I generally recommend deletion only if I think a page never should have existed in the first place or cannot be useful in any way in the present and future. The assessments that have already been done are useful for historical record-keeping.  If you think there's no point in updating this archive anymore, I would agree. Yechiel Man  13:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Now tagged as historical & superseded by automated log - Papa November 1 13:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Album articles by quality log as deprecated. There's likely no use in this page for anyone, and the real log truncates itself too. The top part of the page is redundant to this automated edit, for instance. –Pomte 19:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.