Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources/About.com Critics Table

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources/About.com Critics Table


Horribly outdated. About.com was retooled into dotdash.com a few years ago, wiping out all of their album reviews in the folk process. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:52, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. The site has been revamped/retooled but I still use a lot of Robert Fontenot's about.com pieces for song articles here. He's identified as an RS on this table, and as with other RS about.com contributors no doubt, many of his articles can still be found at archive.org. So, unless I'm missing something, we still need this (very useful) list to tell us which contributions to about.com can be treated as reliable and which ones cannot. JG66 (talk) 06:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. We can move the page to a new title if needed. The critics are still reliable, that hasn't changed. Archive.org can be used to find old reviews.-- 3family6 ( Talk to me   &#124;  See what I have done  ) 10:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.