Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Style guidelines

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep as an essay. To avoid confusion, I will (as an editorial act, not a specific consensus from this discussion) move the page so it doesn't have "guideline" in the name. --RL0919 (talk) 15:36, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Animation/Cartoon Network work group/Style guidelines
Relisted. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:10, 23 June 2011 (UTC)



Unsessery style guidelines. Contains a lot of fancruft and OR. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  00:53, 16 June 2011 (UTC) 
 * keep mark as inactive, or edit the page to say what it should instead. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Userfy or delete. Mainly the work of Baa who is listed as 'retired' although he did edit once in March. Marking as inactive is not an option as it is essentially misplaced. -- Klein zach  03:12, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio  Let's talk about it! 11:10, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep and tag as guidance essay. These guidelines appear to be largely consistent with general Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Much of it seems to be good advice. If there are problems with the page, it can be edited. I disagree with the premise of the nom that says that the page "contains a lot of fancruft and OR", and I don't even know what the nom is thinking of by saying that. Rather, this page advises contributors who work on cartoon-related articles to not include fancruft and original research in those articles. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 23:50, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
 * In my view, marking as an essay implies changing the name (for both access and context). Any ideas? -- Klein zach  00:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think the name would need to be changed just because the page would be marked as an essay. Since this page is not problematic, I think it would have been fine if this page had not been brought to WP:MFD at all and nothing had been done to change its status. The current placement under the Cartoon Network work group seems reasonable to me. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:08, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.