Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/O-Parts Hunter work group

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  No Consensus, policy arguments presented appear to favor keeping, nothing present to override them, but also no consensus. (non-admin closure) Monty  845  18:20, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Anime and manga/O-Parts Hunter work group
This project has been started in 2006 as WikiProject 666 Satan and renamed to WikiProject O-Parts Hunter and converted into work of WP:ANIME since 2008 with no members and no activity. JJ98 (Talk)  07:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Dead project. No activity. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ  ②  08:34, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete-- per nom. -- E♴  (talk)  13:57, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment note the WP:ANIME discussions on whether to adopt or delete the project (in April 2008) and later to absorb it as a WP:ANIME workgroup (in October 2008). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 17:53, 27 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete-- per nom. -- Klein zach  01:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * It should be the prerogative of the wikiproject what to do with their workgroups. If they want to delete it they can just do that; there's no reason for outside people to make the choice if the main wikiproject is active. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 00:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree this is upto the parent project to discuss if they what a page they have marked historical deleted - Would be a good idea if all could read WP:INACTIVEWP before nominating projects for deletion.   Moxy (talk) 01:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:ANIME is already aware of this discussion; if the project wants to keep this work group for whatever reason, that will be made more than clear enough here. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 04:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Inactivity alone is not a reason to delete what was once an active WikiProject/work group. Instead, it should be kept for historical reference and tagged with inactive. —Farix (t &#124; c) 19:22, 31 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per Farix. Miscellany for deletion says "It is usually preferable to either mark the Project as inactive or redirect it to a parent Project, unless the Project is entirely undesirable."  There is no reason this subproject should be deleted instead of being marked as inactive. Calathan (talk) 19:40, 31 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep because we don't delete stuff for just being inactive. As a workgroup page you should have brought this up with the parent WikiProject first before nominating it for deletion. -- Ned Scott 09:42, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Please note User:Dinoguy1000's comments above. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ  ②  12:34, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I never said anything like no one should have asked WP:ANIME first, I pointed out that the project had been notified. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 15:31, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All is fine you voted just one time - you can comment all you like and i think it was nice of you to inform us that the project was notified.Moxy (talk) 15:52, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * WikiProjects are given wide discretion about what to do with their sub-pages, so any deletion of a project's sub-page should be preceded with a discussion by the project before an MfD is started. But in this an in the Haruhi Suzumiya work group, no discussion took place with WP:ANIME. In fact, WP:ANIME wasn't even notified that the Haruhi Suzumiya work group had also been nominated for deletion until I stumbled on to it by chance yesterday. —Farix (t &#124; c) 21:14, 1 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep All three of the editors requesting deletion here agree with the nom, however as was said here inactive projects should not be deleted unless they are fully useless. This is fine being tagged as historical, I say leave as is. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:26, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.