Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Annah Mac

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 23:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Annah Mac


Very narrow scope. Not enough people and not enough pages, can easily be covered in WP:WPMU. undefined — Bill william compton Talk   17:16, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Aren't these types of pages normally marked with Historical (or something equivalent) and archived, rather than deleted? Peacock (talk) 19:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Not necessarily, e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. undefined — Bill william compton  Talk   20:11, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I see. The project nominated here seems to have a similar lack of activity as the examples you've given that were deleted.  Peacock (talk) 20:19, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete and nothing of value was lost. Gigs (talk) 13:22, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Too narrow of a focus. Formed out of process. This has none of the "dressing" (templates, categories, etc.) and isn't mentioned on any of the pages in its scope, so deleting it will harm nothing. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:11, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - One user and three pages is far too small a scope for a useful Wikiproject. Userfication is also an acceptable solution. Achowat (talk) 14:21, 25 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.