Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Backpacking/Navigation

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Archive.  bibliomaniac 1  5  18:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Backpacking/Navigation

 * – (View MfD)
 *  bibliomaniac 1  5  06:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

This is an unused, legacy template in Wikipedia:WikiProject space. Its intended purpose has been replaced by other tools on the main page of the project. —¿philoserf? (talk) 17:38, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - I am not entirely sure what this is, but I don't think that we need it. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:29, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  bibliomaniac 1  5  06:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Archive, unless the WikiProject wants it deleted. Do not nominate WikiProject pages without talking to the members. If you represent the members, then say so.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The conversation was opened with the team. The original project team created the navigation box. It was not used beyond the main project page. Since then we have rebuilt the main page, added subpages, registered with the various bots that support projects, and built out categories for the page assessment system. We do not anticipate needing this navigation box. —¿philoserf? (talk) 18:32, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete If there's zero objection from the Wikiproject to this being deleted, then deleting it is non-controversial housekeeping. I would go ahead and nominate it for CSD, but I think it would be best coming from someone involved with the project. Archive I now agree with the growing consensus that archive may the more prudent move here. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:30, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * “Zero objection from the WikiProject” would be assuming sufficient notification. Nominator’s should be expected to link the notification. Occasionally we have people nominating random stuff from others’ WikiProjects for no good reason. On this occasion, tacking the nom’s contribution history, it can be seen that he has taken on maintenance of this specific wikiproject, which is awesome, thank you. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:40, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , Yeah that's a fair point, but considering that the nom is one of only six members of the project, I figured it was safe to AGF and reach for CSD. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:17, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I sleuthed that out. I wish the nominator of WikiProject pages would say who they are.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I am the most active participant in the project. —¿philoserf? (talk) 22:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * You are. Thanks for your work there. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:37, 12 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Archive: If it was actually used in the past, you may want to keep it to avoid breaking the history of the main page. It is always cool to be able to look back in the history of a wikiproject. You can just add to the top of the page. --MarioGom (talk) 23:10, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.