Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Become a Sysop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was userfied by author, deleted from Wikipedia namespace. Tito xd (?!? - help us) 00:55, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Become a Sysop
A Wikiproject for sharing tips for becoming an admin. OK. Delete. &mdash;Bunchofgrapes (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, unless their already is one. Not sure of nominator's approval when he said OK. -- Eddie 17:50, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * It was one of those sarcastic "OK"s, I'm afraid. I was rendered speechless by the inappropriateness of such a WikiProject. We're trying to build an encyclopedia, not form a become-an-admin club. &mdash;Bunchofgrapes (talk) 17:57, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - This will almost certainly descend into a group which campaigns to get each of their candidates through the RfA process. While I agree that RfA is broken, I don't agree that pushing people through it by diluting consensus is the way to fix it. If I may be so bold...the people that usually participate in these types of ventures are typically those who are unsuitable for adminship in some way, usually through a lack of understanding of how we do things. Rob Church Talk 17:56, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * :From the talk page: I think we need a place where Sysops can share there success stories so then people interested can follow the examples described on these stories
 * :That settles it for me, even further than before. Rob Church Talk 19:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy for now. On second thoughts, I don't think anyone was acting out of bad faith here, and I would love to see a combined mentorship and preparation area for people who want to hold the reins. We've got to face that some new admins coming out of RfA are a bit too green. I think, with the right title and attitude, a holding area for resources on what we want in our admins, and what admins need to be able to do, plus a little informal mentorship for some new and eager users, would be infinitely more useful. Rob Church Talk 01:37, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, pursuing adminship for its own sake is an almost certain guarantee that you won't get it. Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 18:04, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm sure nobody would pursue a promotion "for its own sake" at there job, but people who strive shouldn't have to wait until someone offers it. -- Eddie 20:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete per Rob Church. WP is NOT a political venue (at least of the "politics for its own sake variety.) Xoloz 19:30, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. &mdash; Dan | talk 20:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to IRC CVU  WP:GRFA I suppose not.  Delete. &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 20:46, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Rob. Sarah Ewart 23:36, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, per nom NSLE  ( T + C + CVU ) 00:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this cruft. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  01:25, Dec. 31, 2005
 * Userfy This could have potential to be something helpful one day, perhaps as a pre-rfa area, but should be developed out of WP space. xaosflux  Talk  / CVU  01:27, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * User:EddieSegoura/Ideas/Becoming a Sysop, sigh NSLE  ( T + C + CVU ) 01:38, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Sort of forkish, and admin-ship isn't a goal to such an extent that we need a project for it. WP:GRFA is even going a little too far in that direction. Rx StrangeLove 01:33, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --HappyCamper 06:04, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Write-off. I see a couple of Userfy votes and I have agreed to do that.  I'm writing off the main page and expect it to be deleted soon.  Sorry if it offended anyone.  -- Eddie 00:17, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.