Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject CSI franchise

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. Merging or converting to a taskforce can be discussed elsewhere. Hut 8.5 12:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject CSI franchise
This project was started back in 2007 and went inactive in 2010. No activity since. JJ98 (Talk)  06:36, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Task force of WikiProject Television — because there are relatively many discussions etc.— but only if the Television Project want it. Otherwise Delete. -- Klein  zach  06:58, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree though that it WPTV wants to take it on as a task force that would be ok too. Someone might want to drop them a note and ask. --Kumioko (talk) 16:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete because changing it to a task force... *sunglasses* ...won't force anyone into taking up its tasks. YEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!! Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 17:16, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I would recommend that if this project is deleted that the articles related to CSI be added to WikiProject American television!. --Kumioko (talk) 20:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep/merge With TV WikiProject. This project has TONS of historically relevant content that we definitely should keep. -- Ned Scott 09:37, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Let me quote from some of those seeking deletion. JJ98 wrote, "this project was started back in 2007 and went inactive in 2010." In other words, this project was not a non-starter – in fact, it was active for three years. Then, Kleinzach wrote that "there are relatively many discussions" on the WikiProject's talk page. Surely these two facts alone, admitted by those seeking deletion, are good enough reasons to keep the WikiProject. Let me add some facts of my own: The project had hundreds of articles under its scope, brought two of those articles to GA, and had 16 members over the course of its activity. Given all of these facts, I think it's quite obvious that deleting solely for the reason of inactivity would be inappropriate – indeed, deleting simply for the sake of deleting. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 18:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per A Stop at Willoughby. Encourage interested editors to consider merging to WikiProject Television, but don't do it for them.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.