Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Camila Cabello (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. There was already a consensus to delete, relist totally unnecessary. Closing now per WP:RELIST. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:35, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Camila Cabello

 * – (View MfD)
 * 🐔 Chicdat Chicken Database 11:25, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Two months since the previous deletion discussion commenced, the "project" still has zero (0) active members. It was created and abandoned, never actually put to use. Today it just exists as talk page clutter. There is no interest in a wikiproject for Cabello and it would have never made it through the Proposals page. I vote that we delete this page, and stop endorsing these useless displays of fancruft which are setting a bad precedent. The pretense that one day someone will come along and "revive" it is laughable (also WP:CRYSTALBALL). There is no "project" here, it was created as a status symbol like the now-deleted Portal:Camila Cabello; because "if everyone has one, why shouldn't Camila?" Yes, it is harmful and keeping it encourages more of this behaviour. NØ 07:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: so I can vote in it
 * Delete we really don't need a WikiProject for a person.Catfurball (talk) 18:45, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete with a log reference pointing to Camila Cabello. "Edit Camila Cabello directly".  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - my opinion remains unchanged from the first nomination. -- Whpq (talk) 15:21, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - Still not sure what behavior we are trying to discourage by deleting this project, but it clearly doesn't do anything. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:09, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - Did anyone notice the banner on the talk page of the WikiProject that says that it is covered by WikiProject Camila Cabello? A circular reference.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🐔 Chicdat Chicken Database 11:25, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete A WikiProject with sixty-one pages in it and only relating to one person does not deserve to be a WikiProject, or even a task force. This WikiProject is defunct/stillborn, and I find it strikingly similar to an earlier MfD: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Flight Simulation. Can someone get an admin and delete the page ASAP? 🐔 Chicdat Chicken Database 11:28, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - whatever private reason this was created for, there is no function for this project and it should be deleted, and perhaps salted. Of course, projects can relate to one person if they're Shakespeare or Aristotle. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:48, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * delete scope is too narrow. Frietjes (talk) 17:01, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.