Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada Roads/Golden Horseshoe




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nominator  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  01:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada Roads/Golden Horseshoe
Pretty much an uncontested deletion. Overly ambitious sub project with outdated style guidelines, completely inactive for over 2 years.  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  03:22, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Page is too outdated and conflicts with higher-level wikiprojects too much to merge somewhere or tag inactive. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 05:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, outdated and unmergeable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 16:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Definitely unmergeable. The standards are outdated by over 3 years, and as can be seen by the road articles produced by it, that results in unsourced speculative garbage heaps. -  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  16:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment. I know someone would offer to delete this soon. Since I created the project about 3 years ago, it was after all, an ambitious plan that none of us would ever accomplish. I would gladly revamp the page and make a new equivalent subproject that is confronted to the Wikipedia policy. How does that sound? Smcafirst the Roadgeek (Road talk) at 22:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I think if that is something you're up for, we should work together and create an Ontario subproject of WP Canada roads, and aim for consistency. -  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  23:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Then why don't we simply change the page, and then rename it to WikiProject Canada Roads/Ontario, instead of going through all of these deletion and recreation. Once you delete it, it will be hard to fish the page back for reference. Smcafirst the Roadgeek (Road talk) at 00:11, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If you feel up to that task, by all means. I feel its kind of a mess and starting from a blank slate would produce something a bit more organized. -  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  03:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No, actually I'll be glad to do it. I'll revamp the page within the next few days. Smcafirst the Roadgeek (Road talk) at 00:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Okee dokee. Let's take this back to the project's talk page then. -  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  01:16, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.