Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Chronology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep. Whether it's marked historical or inactive is an editing decision. I'm going to mark it inactive, but feel free to change it to historical. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Chronology
Redundant WikiProject that never got off the ground. The only contributor is the author who is now vanished.. Include various templates, categories, and other related pages. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Optionally, weak Mark historical or weak make to task force for wikiproject time.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 07:09, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep but mark . It has enough information for people who want to resume or make the project active again.  Zoo  Fari  21:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: I think it's important to point out that this was an individual editor's test attempt at creating a new project.  It has never had any other members, it is redundant, and it never survived the proposal process to see if it was even a needed project (it was created before it was proposed).  See WikiProject_Council/Proposals/Archive_1.  There are no articles within the project scope and if anyone wants to make it active, they should be advised to jump on one of the other understaffed existing projects.  At this point the project is a walled garden and I can't see any need to keep it around.  It would be one thing if there was relevant history, but there isn't.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 22:12, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and mark inactive as is standard with defunct Wikiprojects. Stifle (talk) 15:56, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and mark historical. This could actually be a very useful project with over 1000 possible articles in it's scope if someone were to revive it. GrooveDog (talk) 22:33, 25 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.