Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Community/Communitas!

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:20, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Community/Communitas!


Unused, hasn't been edited since American Independence Day 2009. I'm not even sure what it was for. &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 17:21, 23 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per this notice which is present at the bottom of the page. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 18:56, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Sometimes those notices are wrong, or are just there because they are there. However, I certainly won't support deletion without an analysis indicating that the tag can be removed or ignored.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:59, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. The nomination statement is inadequate, I can’t see a reason to delete. The page has an inactive tag, it should go to the top.  Would that solve perceived problems?  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:13, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Content makes no sense, looks like it may be a sandbox. Serves no purpose. No conciveable need for anyone ever to refer to it in future. Amisom (talk) 12:52, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as per SmokeyJoe. "Unused" is not a good reason to delete, particularly for a page marked as 'historical". No advantage to the project in deleting this that I can see. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.