Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer Security/Computer Security articles by quality statistics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was speedy delete (G6) by Bearian. MER-C 04:09, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Computer Security/Computer Security articles by quality statistics
This page is totally in the wrong place. I already created the right page here, so this page can be deleted. --DanielPharos (talk) 11:46, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fully agree the content should be deleted. However, I believe there's really nothing to discuss. You should've asked an Admin for assistance. This qualifies for a regular or even speedy deletion. Why did you put this here? We discuss dificult and unclear incidents on this page - not obvious maintanace issues. OutOfTimer (talk) 13:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Oops, sorry. I'm (kinda) new, and just totally confused by all the different rules here and there sometimes. I just wish there was a magic "fix it all" button somewhere. ;) Anyway, close the 'discussion' and delete the page then. --DanielPharos (talk) 13:41, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, guess what? I'm also kinda new here so don't worry. ;-) I'm working hard on learning Wikipedia policies and understanding how the experts roll here. The thing I love the most is how they use all these funny codes to communicate. I prepared a whole template for myself and now try to memorise them. I hope an Admin will take care of your problem as soon as possible. OutOfTimer (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I've marked the page for speedy deletion and hope an Admin will soon take care of it. I also took down the MfD notice for the time being. If we don't succeed, you may have to put the deletion request on the TfD page and wait for a proper response. OutOfTimer (talk) 16:07, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It just got deleted. Thanks for your help! --DanielPharos (talk) 17:50, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.