Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Darren Shan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted by Grandmasterka, as U1. — xaosflux  Talk  01:33, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Darren Shan
The originator of the project said in the edit summary on the page, in February of this year, Darren didn't approve of this, so I'm shutting it down. Given the total lack of activity since then, and this statement, I am placing the project up for potential deletion. I have contacted the project's originator, and hope to receive clarification on whether this sort of thing was intended then here soon. Badbilltucker 23:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Delete: Too restrictive. bibliomaniac15 01:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: The following comment was posted in response to my post notifying the creator of the project of its pending deletion: Yeah, it's fine if you shut it down. Thanks for checking in with me first.  I think that with this comment the project page may well now qualify for speedy deletion. Badbilltucker 13:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.