Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject FLO

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Deleted by  under G7. (non-admin closure) ~ Matthewrb  Talk to me &middot;  Changes I've made 20:08, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject FLO

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Ridiculously narrow scope for a WikiProject. Created unilaterally. Graham 87 03:13, 24 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per nom. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 03:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to me this would actually make sense if it were about Frederick Law Olmsted. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 04:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Look, I am trying to start something. I do not know how it affects you, here on Wikipedia. And it is literally small, I don't think it really bothers someone. Instead of nominating for deletion, go check some other articles that have one reference. – JuanGLP (talk) 12:34, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Projects require a group of interested editors to get started, not just one. Delete then the project creator can follow the proper procedures at WikiProject Council/Proposals. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 15:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete good faith creation that is unlikely to go anywhere per WP:SNOW Dronebogus (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Final decision by author: Delete – You know what, delete it. Doing it with good faith. Vale et vale! Happy editing. – JuanGLP (talk) 19:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.