Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Far Eastern University

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the page's undeletion. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 00:07, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Far Eastern University

 * – (View MfD)
 * — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 08:56, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 *  —&#8288;Scotty Wong&#8288;—  06:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Delete Project-that-never-was; two participants, one of whom left Wikipedia shortly after creating the project. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep and mark as "historical". I don't see why this shouldn't be kept for possible future potential to those interested. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  —&#8288;Scotty Wong&#8288;—  06:29, 11 December 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The question before us, at this time, seems to be whether this should be retained and marked as historical (created ~6 months ago) or deleted (perhaps softly).
 * Weak Delete - This seems to have failed to launch, and therefore does not need to be marked historical. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:17, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Mark historical: no reason to delete as I see no potential for harm so long as anyone reaching the page sees that it is not an active WikiProject. — Bilorv ( talk ) 00:52, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Soft Delete, like we would do with an abandoned draft in draft space. This wikiproject never got past draft stage, was only active for approximately 10 days and doesn't seem to have done anything so I'm not seeing any reason to keep this page tagged as historical. If someone wants to resurrect the project at some point in the future to have another go they can request undeletion through WP:REFUND. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 15:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 08:56, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment From Template:Historical/doc: "It is also not appropriate for inactive WikiProjects or task forces which are dealt with according to the WikiProject Council/Guide; these should be tagged with or ."  UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:55, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * redirect to Tambayan Philippines. Tell the authors to not thin workgroups when there are already workgroups interested in the topic. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:12, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, it never started and there is no content worth keeping or marking historical. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:39, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes there is. There are lists of articles including red links. Are these red links copied from elsewhere?  If not, this is exactly the proper business of a wikiproject, to scope out missing articles. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.