Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Forumotion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was G8 by Prodego, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:06, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Forumotion
Project page was created in October, with no activity other than this MfD since then. Personally, I don't even know what Forumotion is, so I can't say that it necessarily deserves to be deleted, although I do get the impression that it might. Creator of the page is being notified of this discussion. John Carter (talk) 20:14, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. I didn't know what this was either, but Google seems to think it's a free webforum host . We haven't got even one article relating to this, and even thinking generously there's no prospect of a large number of articles relating to this, so there's no need for a wikiproject. — Gavia immer (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * G8 Dependent on a parent article that doesn't exist, which must be a first for a wikiproject. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Support speedy delete. An article on Forumotion would probably get A7'd pretty quickly (nn-web: it's a small free phpBB host, and I can't find any reliable sources discussing it). One article is too small for a project, anyways, and zero articles even more so. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 23:00, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.