Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Golden ratio

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Tag as inactive, which effectively means to keep it for now. --RL0919 (talk) 01:54, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Golden ratio
Project founder is MIA, as are all but one of the other six members. (There were seven, but I removed one as it was a sock.) Only discussion on talk page pertained to creation of logo and WP banner; absolutely no discussion of articles related to the project. Project page was last edited by founders in 2008, and went a whole year before anyone else touched it; since then, the only edits to the project page are trivial. What's more, there are only 20 articles that can possibly pertain to the project, which seems like an extremely small number — certainly the Math wikiproject is better suited. Since none of the discussion is related to any of the articles that fall under the project, nothing of importance will be lost if deleted. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:09, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not sure what you mean by MIA, exactly; four of the five bluelinked users have edited in the last three months (most within the last few days). That being said, I agree that there doesn't seem to have been much in the way of work on the project over the last couple of years, though it can be tricky to gauge project involvement. I'd like to hear from some of the members before registering an opinion on deletion. Matt Deres (talk) 01:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * MIA I presume refers to missing in action. Recommend tag inactive. Stifle (talk) 09:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see a reason to even tag as inactive if there never was any activity in the first place. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:02, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, yeah, but they're not MIA; they're active editors apparently. Matt Deres (talk) 01:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 16:33, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Among the six users, 20-dude hasn't edited since June, Alanbly since January (except to remove himself from WP:MISSYOU), Einstein95 also since January and Aykantspel since April. I have informed the only two members still editing. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Archive as historic/inactive. Less than thirty watchers, no talk page comments for two and a half years, no comments here after a week.  It is clearly inactive, but has interesting material/discussion, and could be reactivated in future.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Tag as historic Nothin worth keeping now, but it could be revived.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 04:34, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.