Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Hall of Fame


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Withdrawn by nominator. Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 22:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Hall of Fame
A wikiproject devoted to simply saying how great some users are, doesn't help the project in any way, it actually does more harm than good as people who aren't chosen to get upset. No need to keep it, as it doesn't have any useful content--Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 19:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC) Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 19:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - and urge nominator to contact all the active members of the project as well, as is recommended. It can be and is potentially at times a good way to memorialize editors who have left the project, and in fact that was my primary reason for having joined it in the first place. I very much believe that it is in keeping with the spirit of the encyclopedia to at least remember those who have left. At worst, as there isn't a lot of activity, tag as inactive, but there is no just cause for deletion. John Carter (talk) 19:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * What exactly does this project do, anyway?--Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 20:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It was initially created by a now inactive editor to be a place to record those editors who have made contributions to wikipedia of sufficient magnitude to merit their names receiving a place of honor in the history of wikipedia. However, I acknowledge that it slipped my mind for lack of activity for some time. There is now a proposal on the project's talk page to create a virtual "hall" for retired wikipedians, and a few nominees have been suggested. However, prior to that recent activity of mine, it actually did nothing at all, due to the retirement of its founder and everyone else forgetting about it. If there is any response to the suggestions on the project's talk page, I think it could make at least a mild impact on improving the encyclopedia, or at least ensuring that undeniably significant editors not be forgotten when they retire. John Carter (talk) 20:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Seing as both of you want it kept, I'll withdraw the nomination--Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 22:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Very Weak Keep - Mostly harmless. I generally don't like anything like this, but I recognize that I'm in the minority and these things do little harm, as long as they continue to do something.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 22:10, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.