Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Hall of Fame (2 nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. PeterSymonds (talk)  10:38, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Hall of Fame
Deadborn project. Sizzled. Has no relation to the purpose of wikipedia: creation of encyclopedia. `'Míkka>t 19:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the nominator, this does nothing for Wikipedia. We already have featured content as a "hall of fame" of such, no need for a project.Tavix (talk) 20:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * userfy if any of the participants want it, otherwise delete. -- Ned Scott 21:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or tag historical if there isn't much risk of confusion.  MBisanz  talk 01:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as its a deadbeat project. Don't tag it as historical. historical is used for something that once got off the ground IMO like WP:LOCE, and Building Wikipedia membership(I just chose these ones randomly) Pie is good   (Apple is the best)  16:10, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep or tag as historical. Is not such a terrible idea.  I see serious editors signed up.  That was high enough off the ground.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.